| Forum Index > Tournaments |
Dracolich70
Denmark2895 Posts
On November 18 2016 12:23 TomatoBisque wrote: Except that TI has had several EU teams in finals. DC at TI6 was mostly EU players.Europe is usually really good everywhere but TI, where they do really poorly ---- On this note; 1, 2 and 3 at TI6 are knocked down to lower bracket. If Faceless takes Fnatics place, it is 1-5 knocked down. | ||
Asjo
Denmark217 Posts
On November 18 2016 19:01 hunter_x wrote: Had to sleep before the og-eg series started. Did eg just play bad or was og just too good? Didn't watch the whole series, but from what I can tell, EG played quite well, but had some uncharacteristic execution errors and likely some miscommunication in teamfights. OG definitely played quite well, with Ana looking less shaky than before and the chemistry between the creative geniuses of S4 and Jerax starting to spark. | ||
cecek
Czech Republic11441 Posts
about DC being an EU or an NA team. I dont know why it matters, back when LGD.int played, we all knew that it was a team of westerners playing in china. nobody really tried to argue that they were a Chinese team. The DC situation I see as being the same thing. | ||
Asjo
Denmark217 Posts
On November 18 2016 21:25 cecek wrote: about DC being an EU or an NA team. I dont know why it matters, back when LGD.int played, we all knew that it was a team of westerners playing in china. nobody really tried to argue that they were a Chinese team. The DC situation I see as being the same thing. You're right, it doesn't really matter much in the end. It's not a useless distinction, though. Digital Chaos do represent the NA region, so it gives people in NA scene something more to cheer for. Also, it's relevant when you have to compare the strengths of the regions, where it's obvious that the presence of DC adds a lot of the NA region. | ||
MCWhiteHaze
United States130 Posts
I am thoroughly disappointed in EG...Not that OG is a bad team...but come on guys? Just seems like some of those games should have been easily won. It would be kind of refreshing to see VP win this tournament, even though I don't root for them it would be a nice change of pace. Still pulling for EG here though. Get it done boys. | ||
Asjo
Denmark217 Posts
On November 18 2016 22:56 MCWhiteHaze wrote: I am thoroughly disappointed in EG...Not that OG is a bad team...but come on guys? Just seems like some of those games should have been easily won. What makes you feel like the matches should have been easily won? Granted, EG did have the momentum for some parts, but I never felt like they should easily win. | ||
mutantmagnet
United States2991 Posts
On November 18 2016 20:08 nojok wrote: This team that lost in the first round playing badly is definitely NA trash but the TI6 finalists were EU. Sarcasm or not I think these comments should all count as flame baiting at this point. On November 18 2016 21:25 cecek wrote: EG won the laning phase and the lost every single engagement after that in both games. dont know what was more important, how og were or how bad eg was. about DC being an EU or an NA team. I dont know why it matters, back when LGD.int played, we all knew that it was a team of westerners playing in china. nobody really tried to argue that they were a Chinese team. The DC situation I see as being the same thing. I and a few others did argue they were a chinese team. They didn't play much outside that region. | ||
SupLilSon
Malaysia642 Posts
On November 19 2016 00:31 mutantmagnet wrote: Sarcasm or not I think these comments should all count as flame baiting at this point. I and a few others did argue they were a chinese team. They didn't play much outside that region. Pretty sure that guy isn't being sarcastic. Pretty much all his posts are EU > NA flame bait. | ||
| ||
|
|
No Upcoming Events |
