|
EDIT: So the Season is over now. and so is this thread. i Added all finished Tournements and made a small top 10 for this season. I want to thank all of you who kept on checking the thread whenever i updated, and i hope you got some compendium points by following my prediction (which were 100% true for the invitiations *yay*). I will most likely make a new thread in about two months, for the season fall invites and ti5 invites, where i will completely guess their invitiaion method and hopefully will be right again XD. Cu until then. Qody
Hello my name is Qody. I am a long time lurker here and decided to make my first post today.
Since TI4 concluded I collected tournament results because i wanted to see the most successful teams this season.
I chose the invited teams based on last years Invitation method. I will try to keep this blog updated. Thanks for reading.
Qody
EDIT:
TI4 Invitation based on the system I use.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
Good post. Well, Na'Vi is not that far from an invite like i initially thought. But they still need to win a tournament to be safe.
|
Sanya12364 Posts
On January 19 2015 04:05 Qody wrote: I chose the invited teams based on last years Invitation method. I will try to keep this blog updated. Thanks for reading.
Qody Can you show last year's invitation method applied on last year's data?
|
Will C9 really be counted as an NA team if they only have 1 NA player? Or is it based off of the organization's HQ?
|
Will follow this post, pls keep updating thanks!
|
On January 19 2015 04:51 ZeaL. wrote: Will C9 really be counted as an NA team if they only have 1 NA player? Or is it based off of the organization's HQ?
pretty sure C9 will be EU for TI5 cause as valve has said its the players not the organization that matters for these things.
I agree with everything else though, very easy to understand OP
|
On January 19 2015 04:46 TanGeng wrote:Show nested quote +On January 19 2015 04:05 Qody wrote: I chose the invited teams based on last years Invitation method. I will try to keep this blog updated. Thanks for reading.
Qody Can you show last year's invitation method applied on last year's data?
I meant by that, that i took the same amount of invites per region like last year.
|
but you are mistaken it is 4 eu/cis 4 china 1 sea 1 am +previous ti winner
which means c9 was counted as eu last year aswell
|
On January 19 2015 06:00 teddyoojo wrote: but you are mistaken it is 4 eu/cis 4 china 1 sea 1 am +previous ti winner
which means c9 was counted as eu last year aswell
Well then it would be 5 eu 4 cn 1 am and 1 sea invite and the predicted teams would be still the same.
I also added the ti4 Invitation prediction based on my system.
|
no this year it would be 5cn 4 eu
|
An interesting issue will be if Alliance continues to perform badly. Will they get invited this time anyhow? Will be an important precedent. No matter how much I want them there it would be bad for the tournament if they don't improve.
|
On January 19 2015 07:09 Yurie wrote: An interesting issue will be if Alliance continues to perform badly. Will they get invited this time anyhow? Will be an important precedent. No matter how much I want them there it would be bad for the tournament if they don't improve.
of course not, why would you invite someone who perform badly ? just because they won one time ? so at TI11 we dont invite the best teams, just the previously winners ?
|
28057 Posts
Yeah I can't see Alliance getting an invite if they don't deserve it. Maybe if it was TI4 that they won and not TI3?
|
United States13143 Posts
On January 19 2015 07:09 Yurie wrote: An interesting issue will be if Alliance continues to perform badly. Will they get invited this time anyhow? Will be an important precedent. No matter how much I want them there it would be bad for the tournament if they don't improve. Unless there is a drastic improvement in their performance, Alliance should not get a direct invite. They should get a qualifier invite, since they actually had a decent(but not great) third quarter of 2014 and basically everyone got a qualifier invite last time, but definitely not a direct invite.
|
Great first post, well researched
|
C9 listed under AM is weird but it doesn't change anything really, those look like the teams that should go. Maybe you could swap out NAVI/VP for IG/CDEC (who I feel deserves an invite over IG at this point) like teddy said. Interesting seeing it all written out like this, look forward to how close it gets
|
Will be wierd if alot of the topplayers from last year arent present as a player.
|
I don't see Big God on that list.
|
Nice to see this list, but I think TI4 results should be included, as they surely will matter a lot in terms for the invitations.
|
opterown
Australia54649 Posts
On January 19 2015 14:54 Raithed wrote: I don't see Big God on that list. they haven't really done much at all
|
|
|
|